Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. https://doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Cassibba, R., Castoro, G., Costantino, E., Sette, G., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Enhancing maternal sensitivity and infant attachment security with video feedback: An exploratory study in Italy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 36(1), 53–61.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Klein Velderman, M., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., Juffer, F., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Mangelsdorf, S. C., & Zevalkink, J. (2006). Preventing preschool externalizing behavior problems through video‐feedback intervention in infancy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27(5), 466-493.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Klein Velderman, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Juffer, F., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2006). Effects of attachment-based interventions on maternal sensitivity and infant attachment: Differential susceptibility of highly reactive infants. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 266-274.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Koniak-Griffin, D., Anderson, N. L., Brecht, M. L., Verzemnieks, I., Lesser, J., & Kim, S. (2002). Public health nursing care for adolescent mothers: Impact on infant health and selected maternal outcomes at 1 year postbirth. Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 30(1), 44–54.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koniak-Griffin, D., Anderson, N. L., Verzemnieks, I., & Brecht, M. L. (2000). A public health nursing early intervention program for adolescent mothers: Outcomes from pregnancy through 6 weeks postpartum. Nursing Research, 49(3), 130–138.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koniak-Griffin, D., Mathenge, C., Anderson, N. L., & Verzemnieks, I. (1999). An early intervention program for adolescent mothers: A nursing demonstration project. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 28(1), 51–59.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Koniak-Griffin, D., Verzemnieks, I. L., Anderson, N. L., Brecht, M. L., Lesser, J., Kim, S., et al. (2003). Nurse visitation for adolescent mothers: Two-year infant health and maternal outcomes. Nursing Research, 52(2), 127–136.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. https://doi:10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download