Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 281 - 290 of 342, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Shapiro, C. J., Kilburn, J., & Hardin, J. W. (2014b). Prevention of behavior problems in a selected population: Stepping Stones Triple P for parents of young children with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11), 2958–2975. (Study Two)

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Standard Stepping Stones

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shaw, D. S., Sitnick, S. L., Brennan, L. M., Choe, D. E., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2016). The long-term effectiveness of the family check-up on school-age conduct problems: Moderation by neighborhood deprivation. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4 Pt. 2), 1471–1486.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shelleby, E. C. (2015). Effects of the family check-up intervention on reducing growth in conduct problems in toddlerhood through school age: Moderators and moderated mediation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Cheong, J., Chang, H., Gardner, F., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2012). Behavioral control in at-risk toddlers: The influence of the family check-up. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41(3), 288–301.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Shin, S.H. & Choi, C. (2023). Improving birth outcomes among low-income families: The effect of a home visiting intervention. Clinical Pediatrics, 62(11), 1375–1379. https://doi:10.1177/00099228231158367

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Sidora-Arcoleo, K., Anson, E., Lorber, M., Cole, R., Olds, D., & Kitzman, H. (2010). Differential effects of a nurse home-visiting intervention on physically aggressive behavior in children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 25(1), 35-45.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Moore, K. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Effects of video feedback on early coercive parent–child interactions: The intervening role of caregivers’ relational schemas. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(3), 405–417.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Negative relational schemas predict the trajectory of coercive dynamics during early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(4), 693–703.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Wilson, M. N., Winter, C. C., & Patterson, G. R. (2014). Coercive family process and early-onset conduct problems from age 2 to school entry. Development and Psychopathology, 26(4 Pt. 1), 917.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, J. D., Montaño, Z., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Preventing weight gain and obesity: Indirect effects of the family check-up in early childhood. Prevention Science, 16(3), 408–419.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download