Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 371 - 380 of 2541, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home: 2012-2014. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home: Deliverable G. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Casonato, M., Nazzari, S., & Frigerio, A. (2017). Feasibility and efficacy of an attachment-based intervention in a maltreatment sample in residential care: A pilot study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(4), 561–571.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casonato, M., Nazzari, S., & Frigerio, A. (2017). Feasibility and efficacy of an attachment-based intervention in a maltreatment sample in residential care: A pilot study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(4), 561–571.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study is not the most recent and complete version available

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Cassibba, R., Castoro, G., Costantino, E., Sette, G., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Enhancing maternal sensitivity and infant attachment security with video feedback: An exploratory study in Italy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 36(1), 53–61.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Cates, K. K. (1995). Early intervention of at-risk children: Effects on academic performance (Publication No. 304169333) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Caughy, M. O., Huang, K., Miller, T., & Genevro, J. L. (2004). The effects of Healthy Steps for Young Children Program: Results from observations of parenting and child development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(4), 611–630.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Caughy, M. O., Miller, T., Genevro, J. L., Huang, K., & Nautiyal, C. (2003). The effects of Healthy Steps on discipline strategies of parents of young children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 517–534.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download