Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2024
Effects shown in research
Family economic self-sufficiency
Findings rated high
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Economically productive |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
117 children | Adjusted mean = 6.35 | Adjusted mean = 5.51 | Mean difference = 0.84 | HomVEE calculated = 0.17 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.38 |
|
Economically productive | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | % (adjusted) = 71.00 | Adjusted mean % = 68.00 | Difference = 0.03 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Economically productive | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 73.00 | Adjusted mean % = 68.00 | Difference = 0.04 | Study reported = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever used AFDC | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | % (adjusted) = 3.00 | Adjusted mean % = 2.00 | Difference = 0.01 | Study reported = 0.26 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever used AFDC | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 6.00 | Adjusted mean % = 2.00 | Difference = 0.04 | Study reported = -0.68 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 | |
Ever used AFDC |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
117 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.16 | Adjusted proportion = 0.10 | Mean difference = 0.06 | HomVEE calculated = 0.35 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.32 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Ever used food stamps |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
117 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.18 | Adjusted proportion = 0.18 | Mean difference = 0.00 | HomVEE calculated = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.96 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Ever used food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 7.00 | Adjusted mean % = 6.00 | Difference = 0.01 | Study reported = 0.06 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever used food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | %(adjusted) = 6.00 | Adjusted mean % = 6.00 | Difference = 0.00 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever used Medicaid |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
117 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.27 | Adjusted proportion = 0.34 | Mean difference = -0.07 | HomVEE calculated = -0.20 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.44 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Ever used Medicaid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | %(adjusted) = 11.00 | Adjusted mean % = 12.00 | Difference = -0.01 | Study reported = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever used Medicaid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 20.00 | Adjusted mean % = 12.00 | Difference = 0.07 | Study reported = 0.34 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employed during pregnancy | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
36th week of pregnancy | Full (Memphis) | 916 mothers | % (adjusted) = 6.00 | Adjusted mean % = 3.00 | OR = 2.00 | HomVEE calculated = 0.44 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report the difference in this outcome to be statistically significant, p < 0.10, which is greater than the acceptable alpha for this review (α = 0.05).
|
In school during pregnancy | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
36th week of pregnancy | Full (Memphis) | 916 mothers | % (adjusted) = 44.00 | Adjusted mean % = 41.00 | OR = 1.20 | HomVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Months on AFDC , 13–24 months postpartum | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 671 mothers | Adjusted mean = 7.80 | Adjusted mean = 8.40 | Mean difference = -0.60 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report the difference in this outcome to be statistically significant, p < 0.10, which is greater than the acceptable alpha for this review (α = 0.05).
|
Months on AFDC , 0–12 months postpartum | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 681 mothers | Adjusted mean = 7.30 | Adjusted mean = 7.60 | Mean difference = -0.30 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Months worked, 0–12 months postpartum | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 681 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.20 | Adjusted mean = 1.70 | Mean difference = 0.50 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Months worked, 13–24 months postpartum | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 671 mothers | Adjusted mean = 3.40 | Adjusted mean = 3.40 | Mean difference = 0.00 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Used other community services | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
36th week of pregnancy | Full (Memphis) | 916 mothers | % (adjusted) = 29.00 | Adjusted mean % = 20.00 | OR = 1.80 | HomVEE calculated = 0.30 | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.01 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supplemental Security Income, disability enrollment |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
619 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.03 | Adjusted proportion = 0.06 | Odds ratio = 0.58 | HomVEE calculated = -0.33 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.19 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Supplemental Security Income, disability enrollment |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability |
330 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.04 | Adjusted proportion = 0.11 | Odds ratio = 0.33 | HomVEE calculated = -0.67 | Statistically significant, p= 0.01 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current socioeconomic status (percentile ranked by U.S. occupational codes) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 646 mothers | Adjusted mean = 15.62 | Adjusted mean = 13.73 | Mean difference = 1.89 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Highest education level | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 646 mothers | Adjusted mean = 11.61 | Adjusted mean = 11.67 | Mean difference = -0.06 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Number of months mother or child received AFDC (0–60 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 646 mothers | Adjusted mean = 32.55 | Adjusted mean = 36.19 | Mean difference = -3.64 | Not available | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.01 |
Number of months mother or child received food stamps (0–60 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 646 mothers | Adjusted mean = 41.57 | Adjusted mean = 45.04 | Mean difference = -3.47 | Not available | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.01 |
Number of months received WIC (0–54 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 646 mothers | Adjusted mean = 21.51 | Adjusted mean = 23.33 | Mean difference = -1.82 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Number of months received Medicaid (0–54 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 646 mothers | Adjusted mean = 39.59 | Adjusted mean = 41.08 | Mean difference = -1.49 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Number of months worked (0–54 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 646 mothers | Adjusted mean = 19.89 | Adjusted mean = 18.84 | Mean difference = 1.05 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health insurance coverage for the mother |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
1176 mothers | Adjusted proportion = 0.87 | Adjusted proportion = 0.85 | Difference = 0.01 | Study reported = 0.06 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Received any transportation services |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
906 mothers | Adjusted proportion = 0.07 | Adjusted proportion = 0.11 | Difference = -0.05 | Study reported = -0.35 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. The study reported this finding was statistically significant (p = 0.02) prior to a multiple comparisons adjustment. |
Received disability insurance during the past month |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
905 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.05 | Adjusted proportion = 0.06 | Difference = -0.01 | Study reported = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Received SNAP during the past month |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
906 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.43 | Adjusted proportion = 0.46 | Difference = -0.03 | Study reported = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Received TANF during the past month |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
905 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.13 | Adjusted proportion = 0.14 | Difference = -0.01 | Study reported = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Received WIC during the past month |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
909 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.72 | Adjusted proportion = 0.72 | Difference = -0.01 | Study reported = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health insurance coverage for the child, % (fixed effect random slope analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
1113 children | Not reported | Not reported | Difference = -0.01 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p= 0.58 |
Health insurance coverage for the child, % (restricted maximum likelihood analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
1113 children | Not reported | Not reported | Difference = -0.01 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p= 0.65 |
Health insurance coverage for the child, % (split-sample analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
1113 children | Not reported | Not reported | Difference = -0.01 | HomVEE calculated = -0.17 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.40 |
Receiving education or training, % (fixed effect random slope analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
909 mothers | Not reported | Not reported | Difference = -0.06 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p= 0.08 |
Receiving education or training, % (restricted maximum likelihood analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
909 mothers | Not reported | Not reported | Difference = -0.06 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p= 0.15 |
Receiving education or training, % (split-sample analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
909 mothers | Not reported | Not reported | Difference = -0.04 | HomVEE calculated = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.18 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months employed | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 mothers | Adjusted mean = 87.50 | Adjusted mean = 89.70 | Mean difference = -2.20 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Months employed | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 mothers | Adjusted mean = 96.40 | Adjusted mean = 89.70 | Mean difference = 6.70 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months receiving AFDC | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 mothers | Adjusted mean = 70.20 | Adjusted mean = 65.90 | Mean difference = 4.30 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Months receiving AFDC | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 mothers | Adjusted mean = 52.80 | Adjusted mean = 65.90 | Mean difference = -13.10 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months receiving food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy, and comparison (Elmira) | 245 mothers | Adjusted mean = 47.90 | Adjusted mean = 56.40 | Mean difference = -8.50 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months receiving food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 mothers | Adjusted mean = 62.00 | Adjusted mean = 56.40 | Mean difference = 5.60 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Months receiving Medicaid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 mothers | Adjusted mean = 71.10 | Adjusted mean = 70.00 | Mean difference = 1.10 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Months receiving Medicaid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 mothers | Adjusted mean = 61.80 | Adjusted mean = 70.00 | Mean difference = -8.20 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concern about finding work | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 202 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.38 | Adjusted mean = 2.17 | Mean difference = 0.21 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Concern about finding work | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 195 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.43 | Adjusted mean = 2.17 | Mean difference = 0.26 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Concern about finding work | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 192 mothers | Adjusted mean = 1.97 | Adjusted mean = 1.92 | Mean difference = 0.05 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Concern about finding work | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 183 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.24 | Adjusted mean = 1.92 | Mean difference = 0.32 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Help with child care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 204 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.76 | Adjusted mean = 2.64 | Mean difference = 0.12 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Help with child care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 197 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.77 | Adjusted mean = 2.64 | Mean difference = 0.13 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Help with child care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 197 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.83 | Adjusted mean = 2.76 | Mean difference = 0.07 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Help with child care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 189 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.94 | Adjusted mean = 2.76 | Mean difference = 0.18 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Help with child care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
46 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 183 mothers | Adjusted mean = 3.18 | Adjusted mean = 3.00 | Mean difference = 0.18 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Help with child care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
46 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 167 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.97 | Adjusted mean = 3.00 | Mean difference = -0.03 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Number of days on public assistance (0–22 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 194 mothers | Adjusted mean = 236.00 | Adjusted mean = 244.00 | Mean difference = -8.00 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Number of days on public assistance (0–22 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 185 mothers | Adjusted mean = 268.00 | Adjusted mean = 244.00 | Mean difference = 24.00 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Number of days on public assistance (0–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
48 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 208 mothers | Adjusted mean = 437.00 | Adjusted mean = 530.00 | Mean difference = -93.00 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Number of days on public assistance (0–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
48 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 196 mothers | Adjusted mean = 510.00 | Adjusted mean = 530.00 | Mean difference = -20.00 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Number of months employed (0–22 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 194 mothers | Adjusted mean = 6.15 | Adjusted mean = 5.89 | Mean difference = 0.26 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Number of months employed (0–22 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
22 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 185 mothers | Adjusted mean = 7.57 | Adjusted mean = 5.89 | Mean difference = 1.68 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Number of months employed (0–46 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
46 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 196 mothers | Adjusted mean = 17.01 | Adjusted mean = 12.65 | Mean difference = 4.36 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Number of months employed (0–46 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
46 months postpartum | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 208 mothers | Adjusted mean = 15.18 | Adjusted mean = 12.65 | Mean difference = 2.53 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time employed, in months | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 7.10 | Adjusted mean = 7.77 | Mean difference = -0.67 | HomVEE calculated = -2.62 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Time employed, in months | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.50 | Adjusted mean = 4.64 | Mean difference = -0.14 | HomVEE calculated = -0.99 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Use of AFDC-TANF | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
0 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.97 | Adjusted mean = 5.47 | Mean difference = -0.50 | HomVEE calculated = -3.03 | Statistically significant, p < .05 |
Use of AFDC-TANF | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 3.75 | Adjusted mean = 3.97 | Mean difference = -0.22 | HomVEE calculated = -13.10 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Use of food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
0 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 6.27 | Adjusted mean = 6.86 | Mean difference = -0.59 | HomVEE calculated = -3.90 | Statistically significant, p < .05 |
Use of food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.46 | Adjusted mean = 5.06 | Mean difference = -0.60 | HomVEE calculated = -2.65 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Use of Medicaid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
0 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 8.08 | Adjusted mean = 8.39 | Mean difference = -0.31 | HomVEE calculated = -1.88 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Use of Medicaid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 to 12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers | Adjusted mean = 6.02 | Adjusted mean = 6.23 | Mean difference = -0.21 | HomVEE calculated = -0.81 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months mother worked per year |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
642 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 7.09 | Unadjusted mean = 7.71 | Mean difference = -0.62 | HomVEE calculated = -0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.11 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Months mother worked per year |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
618 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 7.68 | Unadjusted mean = 7.98 | Mean difference = -0.30 | HomVEE calculated = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.43 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Months mother worked per year |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
641 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.60 | Unadjusted mean = 0.47 | Mean difference = 0.13 | HomVEE calculated = 0.06 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.46 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Months mother worked per year |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4.5 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
646 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.98 | Unadjusted mean = 1.56 | Mean difference = 0.42 | HomVEE calculated = 0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.19 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Months mother worked per year |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
649 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 5.94 | Unadjusted mean = 5.99 | Mean difference = -0.05 | HomVEE calculated = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.89 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Months mother worked per year |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
640 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.76 | Unadjusted mean = 7.33 | Mean difference = -0.57 | HomVEE calculated = -0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.11 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Months mother's current spouse employed |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
604 mothers | Adjusted mean = 39.62 | Adjusted mean = 25.66 | Mean difference = 13.96 | Study reported = 0.22 | Statistically significant, p= 0.01 |
Author-reported effect size is Cohen's d. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
667 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.81 | Unadjusted mean = 7.24 | Mean difference = -0.43 | HomVEE calculated = -0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.28 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 9.32 | Unadjusted mean = 9.37 | Mean difference = -0.05 | HomVEE calculated = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.88 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 11.03 | Unadjusted mean = 11.32 | Mean difference = -0.29 | HomVEE calculated = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.15 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.94 | Unadjusted mean = 4.32 | Mean difference = -0.38 | HomVEE calculated = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.38 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 4.15 | Unadjusted mean = 5.07 | Mean difference = -0.92 | HomVEE calculated = -0.21 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
10 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
634 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.21 | Unadjusted mean = 6.69 | Mean difference = -0.48 | HomVEE calculated = -0.10 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.26 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
11 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
634 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.07 | Unadjusted mean = 6.78 | Mean difference = -0.71 | HomVEE calculated = -0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.10 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
11 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.88 | Unadjusted mean = 4.14 | Mean difference = -0.26 | HomVEE calculated = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.55 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
11 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 4.57 | Unadjusted mean = 5.45 | Mean difference = -0.88 | HomVEE calculated = -0.19 | Statistically significant, p = 0.03 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 5.54 | Unadjusted mean = 5.84 | Mean difference = -0.30 | HomVEE calculated = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.48 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
634 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.99 | Unadjusted mean = 7.06 | Mean difference = -0.07 | HomVEE calculated = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.88 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 4.16 | Unadjusted mean = 3.89 | Mean difference = 0.27 | HomVEE calculated = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.54 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
13 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 4.01 | Unadjusted mean = 3.77 | Mean difference = 0.24 | HomVEE calculated = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.59 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
13 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 5.78 | Unadjusted mean = 6.12 | Mean difference = -0.34 | HomVEE calculated = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.43 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
13 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
634 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.57 | Unadjusted mean = 6.78 | Mean difference = -0.21 | HomVEE calculated = -0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.64 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
14 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
634 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.76 | Unadjusted mean = 6.92 | Mean difference = -0.16 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.72 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
14 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.71 | Unadjusted mean = 3.68 | Mean difference = 0.03 | HomVEE calculated = 0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.95 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
14 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.10 | Unadjusted mean = 6.32 | Mean difference = -0.22 | HomVEE calculated = -0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.61 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
628 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.40 | Unadjusted mean = 6.75 | Mean difference = -0.35 | HomVEE calculated = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.43 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.68 | Unadjusted mean = 2.93 | Mean difference = 0.75 | HomVEE calculated = 0.16 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
636 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 5.72 | Unadjusted mean = 5.97 | Mean difference = -0.25 | HomVEE calculated = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.55 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
629 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.03 | Unadjusted mean = 2.70 | Mean difference = 0.33 | HomVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.40 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
629 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 5.58 | Unadjusted mean = 5.61 | Mean difference = -0.03 | HomVEE calculated = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.94 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
608 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.31 | Unadjusted mean = 6.59 | Mean difference = -0.28 | HomVEE calculated = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.52 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
17 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
603 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.80 | Unadjusted mean = 6.90 | Mean difference = -0.10 | HomVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.83 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
17 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
606 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.77 | Unadjusted mean = 2.53 | Mean difference = 0.24 | HomVEE calculated = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.53 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
17 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
606 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.17 | Unadjusted mean = 6.01 | Mean difference = 0.16 | HomVEE calculated = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.71 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
603 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.50 | Unadjusted mean = 6.95 | Mean difference = -0.45 | HomVEE calculated = -0.08 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.34 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
601 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.18 | Unadjusted mean = 2.24 | Mean difference = -0.06 | HomVEE calculated = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.87 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
601 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.88 | Unadjusted mean = 6.69 | Mean difference = 0.19 | HomVEE calculated = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.67 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 10.88 | Unadjusted mean = 11.16 | Mean difference = -0.28 | HomVEE calculated = -0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.21 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
667 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 7.37 | Unadjusted mean = 8.10 | Mean difference = -0.73 | HomVEE calculated = -0.16 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.06 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 9.74 | Unadjusted mean = 10.13 | Mean difference = -0.39 | HomVEE calculated = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.16 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 9.96 | Unadjusted mean = 10.07 | Mean difference = -0.11 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.69 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 10.91 | Unadjusted mean = 11.06 | Mean difference = -0.15 | HomVEE calculated = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.53 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
667 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 8.00 | Unadjusted mean = 8.36 | Mean difference = -0.36 | HomVEE calculated = -0.08 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.35 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
667 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.05 | Unadjusted mean = 7.23 | Mean difference = -1.18 | HomVEE calculated = -0.27 | Statistically significant, p = 0.00 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 8.26 | Unadjusted mean = 8.95 | Mean difference = -0.69 | HomVEE calculated = -0.17 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
643 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 10.83 | Unadjusted mean = 11.30 | Mean difference = -0.47 | HomVEE calculated = -0.18 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
619 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 9.11 | Unadjusted mean = 9.78 | Mean difference = -0.67 | HomVEE calculated = -0.22 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
622 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 5.62 | Unadjusted mean = 5.75 | Mean difference = -0.13 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.71 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
619 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.66 | Unadjusted mean = 7.44 | Mean difference = -0.78 | HomVEE calculated = -0.19 | Statistically significant, p = 0.03 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample |
641 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.42 | Unadjusted mean = 7.28 | Mean difference = -0.86 | HomVEE calculated = -0.16 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SES of current job (mother) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 641 mothers | Adjusted mean = 14.01 | Adjusted mean = 13.06 | Mean difference = 0.95 | Study reported = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.56 | |
Months mother employed (54–72 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 641 mothers | Adjusted mean = 9.96 | Adjusted mean = 9.99 | Mean difference = -0.03 | Study reported = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.97 | |
Months of AFDC (54–72 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 641 mothers | Adjusted mean = 7.21 | Adjusted mean = 8.96 | Mean difference = -1.75 | Study reported = -0.22 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 | |
Months of food stamps (54–72 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 641 mothers | Adjusted mean = 9.67 | Adjusted mean = 11.50 | Mean difference = -1.83 | Study reported = -0.24 | Statistically significant, p < 0.01 | |
Months of Medicaid, (54–72 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 641 mothers | Adjusted mean = 11.98 | Adjusted mean = 13.08 | Mean difference = -1.10 | Study reported = -0.15 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 | |
Mother graduated from high school/earned GED (percentage) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 641 mothers | % (adjusted) = 69.00 | Adjusted mean % = 66.00 | OR = 1.12 | Study reported = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.54 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of months employed per year (2–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 3.84 | Adjusted mean = 3.86 | Mean difference = -0.02 | Study reported = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.93 |
Number of months employed per year (6–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 6.86 | Adjusted mean = 7.39 | Mean difference = -0.53 | Study reported = -0.15 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.13 |
Number of months on TANF(6–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 3.39 | Adjusted mean = 4.01 | Mean difference = -0.62 | Study reported = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.12 |
Number of months on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) per year (0–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 5.21 | Adjusted mean = 5.92 | Mean difference = -0.71 | Study reported = -0.14 | Statistically significant, p < 0.01 |
Number of months on food stamps per year (0–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 6.98 | Adjusted mean = 7.80 | Mean difference = -0.82 | Study reported = -0.17 | Statistically significant, p < 0.01 |
Number of months on food stamps per year (6–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.89 | Adjusted mean = 5.92 | Mean difference = -1.03 | Study reported = -0.21 | Statistically significant, p = 0.02 |
Number of months on Medicaid per year (0–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 9.71 | Adjusted mean = 10.07 | Mean difference = -0.36 | Study reported = -0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.12 |
Number of months on Medicaid per year (6–9 years postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 627 mothers | Adjusted mean = 8.79 | Adjusted mean = 8.74 | Mean difference = 0.05 | Study reported = 0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.89 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational achievement (years) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 427 mothers | Adjusted mean = 11.51 | Adjusted mean = 11.51 | Mean difference = 0.00 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Graduated from high school or earned GED | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 424 mothers | = 0.80 | = 0.76 | OR = 1.26 | HomVEE calculated = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.35 |
Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 424 mothers | Adjusted mean = 14.42 | Adjusted mean = 13.38 | Mean difference = 1.04 | Study reported = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.22 |
Months of AFDC (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 424 mothers | Adjusted mean = 1.88 | Adjusted mean = 2.10 | Mean difference = -0.22 | Study reported = 0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.69 |
Months of food stamps (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 424 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.32 | Adjusted mean = 3.98 | Mean difference = 0.34 | Study reported = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.67 |
Months of Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 424 mothers | Adjusted mean = 7.34 | Adjusted mean = 6.98 | Mean difference = 0.36 | Study reported = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.71 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational achievement (years) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 440 mothers | Adjusted mean = 11.62 | Adjusted mean = 11.51 | Mean difference = 0.11 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months employed (1–12 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 425 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.21 | Adjusted mean = 3.97 | Mean difference = 0.24 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months employed (13–24 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 439 mothers | Adjusted mean = 6.14 | Adjusted mean = 5.73 | Mean difference = 0.41 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months on AFDC (1–12 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 425 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.60 | Adjusted mean = 2.35 | Mean difference = 0.25 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months on AFDC (13–24 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 439 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.31 | Adjusted mean = 1.92 | Mean difference = 0.39 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Findings rated moderate
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4 years | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 152 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.18 | Unadjusted mean = 0.40 | Mean difference = -0.22 | Study reported = -0.23 | p = 0.16 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4 years | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 414 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Unadjusted mean = 0.06 | Mean difference = 0.04 | Study reported = 0.04 | p = 0.72 | Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 394 mothers | Unadjusted mean = -0.01 | Unadjusted mean = -0.08 | Mean difference = 0.07 | Study reported = 0.12 | p = 0.34 | Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 357 mothers | Unadjusted mean = -0.15 | Unadjusted mean = -0.17 | Mean difference = 0.02 | Study reported = 0.03 | p = 0.84 | Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 years | Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 183 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.48 | Unadjusted mean = 0.06 | Mean difference = 0.42 | Study reported = 0.42 | p = 0.03 | Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 205 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.32 | Unadjusted mean = 0.45 | Mean difference = -0.13 | Study reported = -0.12 | p = 0.54 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4 years | Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 214 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.36 | Unadjusted mean = 0.44 | Mean difference = -0.08 | Study reported = -0.07 | p = 0.72 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 569 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.54 | Unadjusted mean = 1.60 | Mean difference = -0.06 | Study reported = -0.04 | p = 0.78 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 308 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.03 | Unadjusted mean = 1.74 | Mean difference = 0.29 | Study reported = 0.19 | p = 0.11 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 657 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.30 | Unadjusted mean = 2.21 | Mean difference = 0.09 | Study reported = 0.05 | p = 0.7 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 338 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.48 | Unadjusted mean = 2.51 | Mean difference = -0.03 | Study reported = -0.02 | p = 0.88 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
54 months | Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 325 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.52 | Unadjusted mean = 2.71 | Mean difference = -0.19 | Study reported = -0.11 | p = 0.35 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
54 months | Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 626 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.40 | Unadjusted mean = 2.28 | Mean difference = 0.12 | Study reported = 0.06 | p = 0.63 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 332 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.84 | Unadjusted mean = 2.34 | Mean difference = 0.50 | Study reported = 0.30 | p = 0.01 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 627 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.86 | Unadjusted mean = 2.04 | Mean difference = -0.18 | Study reported = -0.11 | p = 0.38 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | 617 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.93 | Unadjusted mean = 1.93 | Mean difference = 0.00 | Study reported = 0.00 | p = 0.99 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months employed (1–12 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 406 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.35 | Adjusted mean = 3.97 | Mean difference = 0.38 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months employed (13–24 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 419 mothers | Adjusted mean = 6.87 | Adjusted mean = 5.73 | Mean difference = 1.14 | Not available | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
Months on AFDC (1–12 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 406 mothers | Adjusted mean = 2.31 | Adjusted mean = 2.35 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Months on AFDC (13–24 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 419 mothers | Adjusted mean = 1.95 | Adjusted mean = 1.92 | Mean difference = 0.03 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Graduated from high school or earned GED | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 431 mothers | = 0.82 | = 0.76 | OR = 1.39 | HomVEE calculated = 0.20 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.18 |
Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 431 mothers | Adjusted mean = 15.13 | Adjusted mean = 13.38 | Mean difference = 1.75 | Study reported = 0.11 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
Months of AFDC (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 431 mothers | Adjusted mean = 1.95 | Adjusted mean = 2.10 | Mean difference = -0.15 | Study reported = -0.19 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.78 |
Months of food stamps (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 431 mothers | Adjusted mean = 4.56 | Adjusted mean = 3.98 | Mean difference = 0.58 | Study reported = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.47 |
Months of Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 431 mothers | Adjusted mean = 8.08 | Adjusted mean = 6.98 | Mean difference = 1.10 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.26 |