Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 31, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Guyer, B., Barth, M., Bishai, D., Caughy, M., Clark, B., Burkom, D., Tang, C. (2003). The Healthy Steps for Young Children Program National Evaluation. Baltimore: Women’s and Children’s Health Policy Center, Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Jacobs, F., Easterbrooks, M. A., Goldberg, J., Mistry, J., Bumgarner, E., Raskin, M., Fosse, N., & Fauth, R. (2015). Improving adolescent parenting: Results from a randomized controlled trial of a home visiting program for young families. American Journal of Public Health, published online ahead of print, e1-e7.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Jacobs, F., Easterbrooks, A., & Mistry, J. (2015). The Massachusetts Healthy Families evaluation-2 (MHFE-2): A randomized, controlled trial of a statewide home visiting program for young parents: Final report to the Children's Trust of Massachusetts. Medford, MA: Tufts Interdisciplinary Evaluation Research.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Kirkland, K., Lee, E., Smith, C., & Greene, R. (2020). Sustained impact on parenting practices: Year 7 findings from the Healthy Families New York randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 21(4), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01110-w.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Kirkland, K., & Mitchell-Herzfeld, S. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of home visiting services in promoting children’s adjustment in school: Final report to the Pew Center on the States. Rensselaer, NY: New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Bureau of Evaluation and Research.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Knox, V., & Michalopoulos, C. (2023). Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), United States, 2012-2019. MIHOPE Model Results Documentation [Study 2-HFA contrast]. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37848.v3.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Knox, V., & Michalopoulos, C. (2023). Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), United States, 2012-2019. MIHOPE Model Results Documentation [Study 1, EHS contrast]. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37848.v3.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Knox, V., & Michalopoulos, C. (2023). Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), United States, 2012-2019. MIHOPE Model Results Documentation [Study 4-PAT contrast]. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37848.v3.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Lind, T. (2017). Intervening to enhance emotion regulation: Early childhood adversity, parent-child mutual positive affect, and later child regulation capabilities (Publication No. 1972774602) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

McCombs-Thornton, K., Wang, Y., & Sturmfels, N. (2023). Parents as Teachers Family Outcomes: New Insights from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE). Parents as Teachers National Center. https://parentsasteachers.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PAT-Family-Out…

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that satisfies the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download