Research database

Displaying 21 - 30 of 2490
Albritton, S., Klotz, J., & Roberson, T. (2003). Parents as Teachers: Advancing parent involvement in a child’s education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS.
Model(s) reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®
Rating: Low
Albritton, S., Klotz, J., & Roberson, T. (2004). The effects of participating in a Parents as Teachers program on parental involvement in the learning process at school and in the home. E-Journal of Teaching & Learning in Diverse Settings, 1(2), 189–208.
Model(s) reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - additional source

Aldrich, H., & Gance-Cleveland, B. (2016). Comparing weight-for-length status of young children in two infant feeding programs. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 20(12), 2518–2526.

Model(s) reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Rating: Low

Aldrich, H., & Gance-Cleveland, B. (2018). Comparing weight-for-length status of young children in two infant feeding programs. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(12), 2518–2526.

Model(s) reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Rating: Does not pass screens

Allen, L., Sethi, A., & Astuto, J. (2007). An evaluation of graduates of a toddlerhood home visiting program at kindergarten age. NHSA Dialog: A Research-to-Practice Journal for the Early Intervention Field, 10(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240750701301811

Model(s) reviewed: ParentChild+® Core Model
Rating: Low
Alonso-Marsden, S., Dodge, K. A., O’Donnell, K. J., Murphy, R. A., Sato, J. M., & Christopoulos, C. (2013). Family risk as a predictor of initial engagement and follow-through in a universal nurse home visiting program to prevent child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37, 555-565.

Model(s) reviewed: Family Connects
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study

Alsancak-Akbulut, C., Sahin-Acar, B., & Sumer, N. (2020). Effect of video-feedback intervention on turkish mothers' sensitivity and physical intrusiveness: A randomized control trial. Attachment & Human Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1753085

Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Altfeld, S. (2002). The Chicago Doula Project evaluation final report. Chicago, IL: The Ounce of Prevention Fund.
Model(s) reviewed: HealthConnect One's® Community-Based Doula Program
Rating: Low

Alyousefi-van Dijk K., de Waal, N., van IJzendoorn M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J. (2021). Development and feasibility of the prenatal video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for expectant fathers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1–14.

Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Ambrose, T., Walton, K., Annis, A., Buchholz, A., & Haines, J. (2017). Putting family in Guelph Family Health Study. Guelph, Canada: University of Guelph. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/e3435089-54ed…
Model(s) reviewed: Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)
Rating: Does not pass screens